At =mc we are increasingly asked by our clients to deliver ‘some training on change.’ The challenge with such a request is that organisational change is a big topic. Change itself is an ambiguous word and used in many contexts. So depending on where the challenge is, any ‘training’ could cover any number of issues such as: tools and techniques for analysing what is driving change; making decisions and plans for change; acquiring the interpersonal skills needed to get buy-in and communicate change; developing the emotional intelligence needed to build resilience and support people through change; tools for implementing a change project – and so on.
The key to successful organisational change is making sure that change is happening for the right reasons, that the right change approach is being used, and that the right result will be achieved. At =mc we talk about this in terms of:
Change has been happening for a very long time but has tended to happen slowly – just ask Darwin. However, the issue for many organisations now is that change is happening at a faster rate, and has become more pressing in response to stronger and more threatening external challenges (or drivers).
When we ask our clients what are the challenges that they are experiencing with change, we tend to hear the same three things:
1. There is no choice – change has to happen because if it doesn’t the organisation will fail in some way.
2. Change is often uncomfortable and messy and without the tools and techniques to manage the process properly it can quickly derail.
3. People don’t like change – it means having to adapt to new ways of working, undertaking new work activities and sometimes adapting to new cultural values that might not sit naturally with their own values.
To respond to these issues, it’s really important to understand who is responsible for what during change. From there, we can begin to diagnose what interventions may be useful.
At a recent =mc thought leadership event, we asked L&D practitioners from organisations from the MS Society to the British Red Cross, and Marie Curie Cancer Care to ActionAid what they thought different people in their organisations were responsible for when it came to organisational change. There are three key groups they were asked to consider:
Any organisation’s biggest staff group, these people play a key role in delivering your mission and achieving your vision. Without them, the work doesn’t get done. Without them, whatever it is that needs to change won’t actually happen. And yet they typically have the least input into a change process unless there is a legal requirement for consultation. Organisations neglect frontline staff in times of change at their peril. Once a change is decided, they play a critical role in its implementation – how it can actually be effected at a very practical level. For change to be successful, it’s essential for this group to get involved, to actively participate in what is happening and to adopt new ways of working.
These are the people whose primary role is to support the change, and consider its implementation for their function and/or team. They need to operationalise the strategy that’s been decided, and they have a key role in communicating the change. Often seeing themselves as the ‘squeezed middle’ they have to both influence upwards, and engage downwards – supporting and questioning the decision-makers, and supporting and answering questions from the frontliners. They need to represent the views of each group to the other whilst carefully managing expectations.
These are the people who set strategic direction and focus on the big picture. They horizon scan the external environment and assess the strengths and weaknesses of the internal environment. Their role is to decide that change is going to happen, and why, and to what end, and to articulate the drivers for change in as transparent a way as they can. They are responsible for driving the change. Ultimately they are responsible for ensuring that change happens. It is not their role to decide how that decision will be implemented or what it means at a practical level. This is delegated to the next tier down.
We then asked our L&D practitioners to consider how these groups might be feeling about change and what principles should guide them through it. Here’s a summary of the discussion:
|To contribute the detail and deliver practical solutions||
Powerless, helplessness, fear, anxiety
Excited, motivated, engaged
|To communicate, implement and engage others||
Frustrated, anxious, fear, pressured, put upon
Supportive, involved, motivated
|To spot the need for change and set direction||
Fear, sadness, needing to prove oneself, lonely
These guiding principles for behaviours in change are just that – a guide. The range of negative as well as positive feelings people can experience during change means putting the principles into practice may need some additional help, which is where L&D comes in. L&D can offer support and provide tailored interventions for each group depending on their needs. Here are the suggestions our professionals came up with about how L&D can help in change:
|L&D role||L&D interventions|
|Frontline||Reduce the fear, increase the excitement
Finally, change can also be tough for L&D practitioners. While providing support to everyone else, it’s equally important you get support and recharge your batteries. Make sure you are clear on the change proposition, and don’t forget to ask the questions you need answering. Take good care of yourself.
If you’ve found this article helpful and you would like more information, please call +44 (0)20 7978 1516 or contact us online to speak to one of our experienced consultants.
Need a quick answer to a specific challenge? Not sure what you're looking for or haven't time to search? Send me a message and we'll get back to you as soon as possible with an answer.
Or if you'd prefer to speak to someone, call 020 7978 1516.
Yvette Gyles, Director